I have a very different opinion abot the role it played  the model here, in this “Rebirth of nature”...Ok. The concept of change is integral in his collection. The man that it actually breathed new life into the old organic view, which had been smothered by anthropocentric interpretations of the nature..but, the creatures were not made for themselves..and not in the dethronement of man..

The designer  asserts that the organic view of nature made a full recovery..but he does imply that, with this new designing interpretations  - raising moral standards and with new  discovery..
So, nature should to speak, given back some of shes rights as a living organism, or here, in this pictures is like different sides of the same coin. ..

However..I do agree on one thing: something new seems to have "killed" the organic view of nature in this springtime period. But while the designer looks like he stop here, pessimistically asserting that he have not moved beyond that "rebirth of nature,"  it’s like the title opposed.. to being merely an enemy of nature, actually resuscitated it. :P


Rebirth of nature - by Josh Olins
Model - Julius Gherhardt
Fashion editor - Nicola Formichetti

[Picture+13.png][Picture+1.png][Picture+7.png][Picture+11.png][Picture+10.png][Picture+5.png][Picture+4.png][Picture+6.png][Picture+9.png][Picture+2.png]

0 Responses so far.

Post a Comment

Da cu o parere, nu doare..